Wednesday
Sep162015

First Prints and Some Research

So after an adventure in Arrington Virginia battling the rain and the heat and eventually the cold, I have returned and started where I left off.  I have completed my first two silk screens with some exciting results and motivation for the future.  Largely, I see this as a color study so far but am coming up with idea for how to integrate smaller silkscreen layering into my body of abstract paintings.  Here they are.

I still can't get over how simple this process is and yet it lends itself to a vast array of possibilities.  More playing with color combinations and opacity and transparency.  Maybe I'll do a few on white paper.  It all reminds me of being in a dark room with all the specific steps.  Cue paper, rase screen, pull color, lower screen, pull color, raise screen, remove paper, rinse, and then go to the next screen and repeat.

Ok, so that is what happened in the creation side of things since I have been back.  More to come about all that as I make more attempts.  Research has continued and I'm finding that I am aware of a lot of contemporary artists but I haven't memorized all the names that go with the works.  Art history was never my strongest area.  Anyways, I am investigating abstract artist that are largely dependent on mark making for the time being.

Sue Williams, Mark Bradford, Matthew Ritchie are a few examples.

Sue Williams created gestural paintings during a time when New York City's radical art community was rather anti-painting in mentality and she placed the responsibility of expression on her quality of line. Previous to this time she was more direct and aggressive in her presentation of sexism, rape, insest, and other forms of sexual violence by way of more objective representation.  Later work holds abstractions of the body in particular genitals and orifices, wrinkles, hair, and things that peak her interests like chicken feet.  Never full body abstractions like the works of de Kooning.  Basically she went from outrage among the sexist art world to profound abstract painter in a very short time.  I always thought that Miro and Arshile Gorky just spent there time abstracting genitalia and organelles but I may need to do more searching to confirm for sure.

Mark Bradford has always been a master of presenting community through abraction and is also largely dependent on the marks he makes with paint and collage.  His pieces are worked so intensely that these studio creations convince the viewer that they may be actual maps of real locations but are rather just representations or the community dissonance and harmony that exist along the ever changing urban landscape.  I see population distributions and the process of urban decay.  The decay he presents through collaging with images from third party advertising that has aged and faded in the sun over a matter of days as well as his use of reductive methods with grinders and sand paper.  Again these works do not work without the weight of focus distributed to mark making.

Mathew Ritchie fits in nicely with my recent critique.  There is no canvas in much of his work.  The space the work exists in becomes the surface breaking from the border and deckled edges.  His work crosses the border and back between sculpture and painting.  What I find interesting about his work is how graphic it is in much the same way that screen printing creates a graphic mark.  The layering and entanglement of his work create and amazing amount of depth in an abstract universe.  Apparently his work evolved out of minimalist influences.  His work is largely inform through the collection of information and the control we put on that flow of information.  What we take in and what we don’t and he presents this through intensely controlled and often overwhelming compositions that he creates through drawing painting and computer manipulation.

Wednesday
Sep092015

Silkscreening

This is a time to explore.  A time to break habits and find new destinations.  I’ll be back.

Silk screening is an art form that I have been wanting to try for a long time.  I have never had the facilities to explore it.  If all goes well I will try and integrate these new tools into my existing thread which on it’s own isn’t going to be quite where I left it.

So here is what happened this week after crit.  I created four screens for a print that is going to explore color, transparency, and opacity among other things.  My goal is ten variants.

Also, I made another Bender.  Now in color!  This one is going to live on my housmates desk.

Monday
Sep072015

Critique #1

This is the work that was presented at my first critique last Thursday.  A more in depth entry to come. Enjoy.


Sunday
Aug302015

CCAD MFA Week #1: Whatever you do take care of your shoes.

08-30-15

A lot has happened in the first week of my graduate schooling at CCAD.  Orientation feels like weeks ago already.  It’s a hell of a lot of fun telling people that I am part of the program when they ask and I say it with so much joy.  I have never had a week of art making that really touches what has already transpired.  Studio visits with multiple professors with more to come.  I go home to use my bed and shower.  Tim Rietenbach and Gordon Lee have already stopped by for some studio time both with unique approaches to discussing and critiquing my work.  Tomorrow I’ll be sharing conversation with Rob Robbins on the subjects of giant stretcher building and my work in general.  Tuesday’s plan is to hang out with Kathy McGhee and learn about photographic silk screening for some potential implementation in future canvas work.  We’ll see what happens with that as I know very little about silk screen printing.  Along with that I have been enjoying getting used to running the facilities over in Battelle.  So much fun already.  Saturday was a day of exploring the tools in the wood side of the building in my free time.  I made a relatively simple Bender bobble head. Makes me laugh.  

My studio space came together really quickly and I didn’t hesitate to put paper on the floor and spill some paint.  Energy is good right now and work is flowing out rather nicely.  I hope to have 6 pieces pretty close to completed by Tuesday’s crit and I really can’t wait.  Before applying to school I used to go to MFA portfolio days just for critiques.  There were a few years that I went and didn’t apply.  There isn’t much like the growth you get from the variety of perspectives available at those events and I took advantage of them until I was ready to commit.

So here is how I feel right now about possible directions for work.  There is the proposed light/mirror boxes from my original proposal that has already evolved into a more powerful idea.  Gordon Lee introduced me to the concept of projection mapping which would allow me to paint with light and explore sculpture and 3D space.  I’ll be toying with the process of creating a projector out of my phone and a magnifying glass to see if there is a spark of energy in that direction.  I think there is quite a bit.  The learning curve is a bit startling but I think I can figure it out.  The trick will be making something that isn’t just a “cool for cool’s sake” but rather creating a work that integrates with what I am already exploring and carries a deeper impact.  It fits into my long history of romance with light via the camera but will allow me to actually paint with light and motion instead of just react to it.  

Another direction of exploration is to go huge.  It seems that everyone wants my paintings to be massive and immersive. Tim believes that my work with “Grasping Photons” speaks to a larger format and I have to agree.  Molly and John have said they would like to see my paintings go larger as well.  The tough part would be learning to treat brushes like pastels.  I can’t get that crisp line that I can make with a piece of chalk so that is why I thought I would explore screening processes.

The theme that I see growing regardless of what I makes is the search for why.  Gordon Lee put it rather nicely.  Currently my work is like a moth and a light bulb.  Why is the moth continually bashing into the light over and over and over?  I want to find the reasoning for my compulsions, the reason I am smashing into the bulb.  It’s not going to come over night but I might have some thoughts that I will reveal when I am more comfortable with how the intertwine with my present direction and future research into the matter. Until this I want to explore everything available that might add to what I create.

My understanding of my actual placement in contemporary art is expanding pretty rapidly as well.  In college, art history stopped at around the 1950’s as I never managed to take the contemporary history class and thus a lot of what I am responding to is two and three generations back.  I had the opportunity but chose not to for ignorant silly reasons.  I didn’t like what I was seeing in the books and 7 years ago didn’t fully respect what was happening.  I mean, the Pizzuti Collection exists and I didn’t know about it until last spring.  Incredible work in that collections.  Tomory Dodge!  Anyways, Tim has been feeding me names, a few of which I was aware of.  Sue Williams, Albert Oehlan, Gerhard Richter, Ross Bleckner, Brice Marden, Joan Mitchel, Terry Winters, Philip Taffe, Elizabeth Murray, Sarah Cain, Mark Bradford.  My question will be why do these artist do what they do?

08-31-15

So Rob Robbins has stopped by and given me some justification for exploring multiple directions.  Large painting is going to happen soon.  I might build a few large canvases next week.  Continuing to find a good outflow of work is my initial goal.  They just need to “vibe” right and not fight.  Working on paper is allowing me to spill out many risk free pieces of work which can later be used to inform much larger works.  The projection mapping project will be a continued exploration throughout the semester but may not culminate in much more than an understanding of how.  Until I can determine if it is a direction I want to really dive deeply into I’m going to continue producing as many pieces as I can.


It is going to be helpful to understand my past history in art.  I was (and still am) a photographer in undergrad at Allegheny College in Meadville PA.  My work initially existed in the wet room and film and moved to digital when I wanted to start producing more.  These early explorations took me into abandoned buildings in the surrounding area.  The Talon Zipper Factory was an incredible place with massive factory windows and repetitive support structures.  I was studying geometry, light, decay, and texture.  Later explorations of texture and light took my into work with High Dynamic Range (HDR) imaging.  This is a process where three or more bracketed images are layered and leveled to replace portions of clipping (highs and lows) with detail from the images.  Eventually I needed to explore something else.  The buildings I was using were being leveled.  The talon factory was demolished 2 weeks after I finished shooting and it came as a surprise.  I struggled with finding inspiration in my surroundings.  People were starting to use LEDs and Flashlights to artificially light surroundings and I thought it was cheesy most of the time and that most of the time people were just surviving off of the bells and whistles that came along with it. Composition with photography is paramount and these people weren’t really doing it justice in my opinion.  I started painting with lights and capturing motion through long exposures and after a shoot I would go through the hundreds of images and pick the ones that were energetic compositionally.  Some of these works were layered and manipulated but most of them were displayed as the camera captured them.

Then came the paintings, which were largely inspired by a project from an intro drawing course that I took just to get time with Sue Buck who I believe to be brilliant.  She exposed me to the freedom of a blank piece of paper (this was the first one very Arshile Gorky heavy) and I put the camera down.  No longer was I forced to respond to my surroundings and the light around me.  I felt free and that is what I have been running off of for the last almost 7 years.  Photography and my training in that medium largely informs my work.  How could it not?  I haven't stopped shooting photos all together.  Since 2009 I have been photographing concerts from the pits at local bars and national music festivals.

Art 21 has been a great source for exploring contemporary art.  Katherine Grosse makes these giant crumpled sculptures out of hot wire cut styrofoam that look like balled or rolled up canvas.  Her work combines painting and sculpture and her application of paint really pushes concepts of scale with relationship to the viewer and the surroundings.  Leonardo Drew discusses comfort and his uncomfort with that comfort.  He is largely a process driven artist, informed by previous works, and doesn’t intend to explain his work.  He says he can’t tell you.  He just constantly places himself in the act of attempting to know.

Tuesday
Feb042014

Show Review: 2014-01-31, The Werks and Umphrey's McGee

Friday night, January 31st, two Midwest bands performed at Lifestyle Communities Pavilion’s (LC) indoor stage that rocked the socks off of a sold out crowd.  The fans packed in early for The Werks from Dayton, Ohio who open the night at 8:00pm with a powerful one-hour set.  It’s always nice to see a full house from start to finish and for fans of this genre, why wouldn’t it be.  This was the Werks first night of two opening for Umphrey’s McGee and it was evident that the band was here to rock.  The Werk’s set composed of jam style songs witch mixed psycodelic rock, funk, and electronic music.  They opened the night with “Duck Farm” and followed it with a cover of “Hush” by Deep Purple with Dan Shaw on keys for some blistering organ.  Dan Shaw has been getting lots of time with the band lately on tour as Norman Dimitrouleas takes some personal time.  Norman took the stage for the rest of the set and fans were evidently pleased.  The band journeyed through the rest of its set, which featured powerful crowd pleasers like “Hard to Find” and closed with “Onlought” which had the crowd amped with its driving riff that pulsed the crowed. Rob Chafin multi tasks technical drum beats while sharing a sizable amount of lead vocals on a number of songs.  This band shreds.

After about a half hour stage change and break for he fans.  Umphrey’s McGee of South Bend, Indiana took the stage for the first of two sets.  For those of you who don’t know about Umphrey’s McGee, you never know what you are going to get.  One show could be straight shredded rock and the next could be heavily electronic and dance influenced.  You just don’t know.  This show happened to be a mix of mostly shredded progressive rock with a splash of electronic. A lot of the set was composed of older material with a few newer tunes.  They opened with “Nipple Trix”.  I wonder what is implied with this song title.  Anyways, this song segued into “Slacker” and then right into “Plunger” to “Glory” back to “Plunger” and into “Pay The Snucka”, which turned into “Final Words” and then back to “Snucka” and finally to a rest with deafening applause.  This string of songs was a journey and something very typical of Umphrey’s McGee.  It traveled from intense aural compositions to mellow and then back again and the set wasn’t over yet.  After this adventure of songs the band mellowed out with “Deeper” and transitioned to “Day Nurse” for the set ender.  It was a rocker of a first set.

 Fifteen minutes passed as the audience prepared for the next set.  The band took the stage again for another long set.  They opened with a 24-minute “Jajunk” which traveled through intricately laid out parts and climaxes with wild soloing from Jake Cinninger and the band. The showcontinued on in an adventurous state evolving from one genre to the next while mixing them together.  “Robot World” started out mellow and electronic and evolved into a heavy hitting drive of the major riff, as it does, and segued into the reggae influences “Higgins”.  “Intnentions Clear” added another fun moment to the show as Jake Cinninger and Ryan Stasik walked out into the audience and performed a high-energy solo on the ramp back to back in the crowd on stage right.  It was like two heroes in a battle and was epic to say the least.  The band ended the set and returned for the encore after the entire crowd cheered and chanted, “We want the Umph, gotta have that Umph”.  When Umphrey’s covers a song, they tend to own it and did so with Led Zeppelin’s “Kashmir”, which then transitioned into “Andy’s Last Beer”.  The audience roared and sent the band off to Detroit for the next gig with The Werks.  Many fans followed. 

Full photo sets of The Werks here and Umphrey's McGee here.

Full photo set of Umphrey's McGee's Jeff Waful light show here.

 

2014-01-31 Setlists from L.C. Columbus, OH

The Werks (opening for Umphrey's McGee) 

Duck Farm

Hush [1]

Fat Man >

Better Half

Hard to Find

Heading South

Onslaught

(Norman Dimitrouleas on keys for all except "[1]")

[1]: Dan Shaw on keys

 

Umphrey’s Mcgee

1ST SET:

Nipple Trix > (03:37)

Slacker > (11:56)

Plunger > (03:35)

Glory [1] > (04:53)

Plunger > (11:20)

Pay The Snucka > (08:00)

Final Word > (04:40)

Pay The Snucka > (03:04)

Deeper (08:29)

Day Nurse > (07:14)

2ND SET:

JaJunk (24:40)

Bad Friday (09:01)

Robot World >  (07:22)

Higgins (13:12)

Intentions Clear > (11:46)

Hajimemashite (09:50)

ENCORE:

Kashmir (08:56)

Andy's Last Beer (06:40)

[1] with Rhiannon (Fleetwood Mac) tease